InfoHub Logo

A court in the East Kazakhstan region has rejected a bid to remove a scientist from the list of authors for a sunflower hybrid patent. The ruling protects the scientist's intellectual property rights, acknowledging their significant role in the development of the hybrid through creative and research-based work.

Background of the Dispute

While the patent itself is held by a company, the documentation initially credited a team of researchers for the hybrid's creation. Subsequently, the patent holder filed a lawsuit seeking to exclude one specific author. The company argued that this individual had only performed technical duties within their job description and did not contribute as an author to the hybrid's development.

Court's Examination and Decision

During the proceedings, the Glubokovsky District Court meticulously reviewed official job descriptions, scientific protocols, and research reports. The court also heard testimony from witnesses and considered expert opinions from specialists in the field of crop production.

Court documents revealed that the process of plant breeding is a continuous scientific endeavor. It involves working with initial and parent lines, developing cross-breeding strategies, conducting trials, and analyzing the outcomes.

The court determined that the scientist possesses specialized education and extensive experience in breeding, having also held the position of senior researcher. Their inclusion among the patent's authors was previously formalized based on a decision by a scientific body that established their contribution.

"The respondent's participation in the breeding process was of a research and creative nature, therefore there is no basis for their removal from the list of patent authors," the court's decision stated.

The initial court ruling was upheld by the appellate instance, the East Kazakhstan Regional Court, which left the decision unchanged. The lawsuit was dismissed.